Act Now!

You have until the 15th January 2019 to register as an interested party and give your views on the Rail Central proposal”. This is your one and only chance to get involved and actively oppose this abomination.  Please do not waste it.  Click on the Planning Inspectorate link below and follow the instructions on their web site.

The Planning Inspectorate

When you register, make it clear (in around 500 words) why you are objecting and what effects it will have on you, your family, your community or the environment. If you have professional expertise and are making technical / legal observations or challenges please make your credentials clear.

If you require further assistance please contact SRC at info@norailinterchange.co.uk or call us on 01604 859098
More detailed information on how to participate in the process can be found in guidance note 8.2  Advice can be found by clicking here

Once you have registered and submitted your representation you will be allowed to take part in the examination process. Whilst not obligatory, you can attend the initial meeting (where the examination timetable is set), submit a more detailed objection at a later date, or take part in any public hearings that might take place. Or you can do nothing further, it is up to you.

Once you are registered as an Interested Party the Planning Inspectorate will communicate with you via email or post. Follow SRC on Facebook or Twitter for the latest information and advice.

Remember, everyone in the household can register individually.  NUMBERS COUNT.

Click on this link to register as an interested party

Sign The Petition

Please click the link below to sign our petition in opposition to this development.

Sign the Petition

Andrea Leadsom

Andrea Leadsom is the Conservative MP for South Northamptonshire.
Please click on the link below to access the website for The Rt Hon. Andrea Leasdom for the latest news available for the constituency.

The Rt Hon. Andrea Leadsom’s website

Have your say!

This is not a site of strategic importance and Rail Central are simply promoting it as such because they own it. Furthermore, it is clearly a commercial, rather than a strategic decision to place a second SRFI within 15 miles of an existing one; one that will not be at capacity until 2033. Surely for it to be strategic it should be linked by a strategy that has been devised nationally and not driven by which developer happens to own a piece of land. This currently does not appear to be the case.

Rail Central is contrary to the adopted West Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy (WNJCS) and in conflict with the commercial, transport and housing objectives of the whole region. A further development on this scale will result in a complete imbalance of planning objectives.

Rail Central have overstated the strategic location and interconnectivity of this particular site:
i) The local road network is already far too congested to accommodate this scheme and cannot be improved sufficiently to mitigate the impact. The main access road is already overstressed and a secondary route through a small village is untenable (The scheme relies on utilising the existing road between Milton Malsor and Blisworth as its only other alternative road: this is completely unacceptable for a scheme of this size (7.5m sq ft.), which would normally require a second connection to a major trunk road)
ii) The Northampton loop line unlikely to have the capacity for additional freight when DIRFT 3 is running at capacity. Rail Central’s claim that both the Northampton loop and the WCML lines will be available are unfounded as WCML is highly unlikely to accommodate slower freight trains throughout the day.

Road congestion will worsen rather than improve with the terminal being a mostly road based logistics park (over half the site cannot be served by rail due to its bisection by the Northampton to Towcester Road)

The impact of this scheme on the local villages and their communities will be both huge and permanent and no amount of mitigation can change this. The activities of rail freight interchanges produce air, light and noise pollution, the effects of which CANNOT be adequately mitigated especially with two villages in such close proximity

The economic landscape is such that there is currently no incentive for commercial organisations to switch from road to rail. Given the relatively short distances involved and without Government subsidy the required modal shift will not occur (There is no requirement for SRFIs, once constructed, to actually accept any freight by rail: they merely have to have the capacity to do so. This is the loophole currently being exploited by Developers)

As a consequence of the above the carbon objectives of this proposal will never be met (at least within any realistic timescale). Rail Central’s claim of “Sustainability” has been challenged

Rail Central is only the start. Granting of permission for this development will inevitably lead to further applications for housing and associated amenities leading to further unwanted development and loss of precious countryside and rural communities